Contract complexity: Driving away the competition


I attended a round table event with several peers today to discuss contract language. Specifically, what is the right language to use; how can it be applied to achieve the desired outcome; and how stringent must one be relative to retaining the original contract language.




Shawn Casemore
Shawn Casemore
The consensus from the group, which included procurement practioners from the public and private sector, litigation and arbitration lawyers and a consultant (I wonder who that would be?) was as follows:

1. Complexity of contract language is deepening
As organizations and individuals develop an increasing aversion to risk in a society that is becoming more litigious, contract language is morphing into verbiage that is well beyond comprehendible and achievable. If you want an example, take a look at the five pages of terms and conditions that accompany a cell phone contract.

2. Efficiency in contract management is on the decline
The time required to review, interpret and negotiate the voluminous documents that accompany most contracts is reducing the efficiency of the contract award process. The resulting delays are hindering end users and customers alike. Delays in the completion of the Edinburgh Tramways in Scotland are a great example of this.

3. Increased complexity is reducing trust
In an age where supplier transparency and alignment are key differentiators for leading edge organizations, the increasing complexity of business contractual language and award criteria are driving a wedge between both parties. If you have recently signed mortgage documents, you can imagine the distress and distrust such enormous documents create between both parties.

The consensus from the team was to focus on the following three areas for improving the contract tendering and management process:

1. Clarity: Identify expectations at the outset of the tendering process.

2. Simplicity: Reduce complexity and apply common sense in developing, administering and managing contract language.

3. Transparency: Avoid hiding behind an ulterior motive and focus on being transparent in order to attain the desired value from the relationship.

Applying common sense in conjunction with these three tips will greatly enhance the contract management process. The starting point is a dialogue with Suppliers to identify weaknesses in the process, and to build support in enhancing the process.

Shawn Casemore, President, Casemore and Co.
www.casemoreandco.com

Contract complexity: Driving away the competition

Vendredi 2 Mars 2012
Notez




Nouveau commentaire :
Twitter

ENGLISH
Articles and press releases are provided as is and have not been edited or checked for accuracy.
Any queries should be directed to the company issuing the press release or to the author issuing the article.
If you have a question for the author, or would like to comment on this article, use the box above. Your comment will be moderated before publication.
Your comment or question will appear below and the author or Finyear editor will be able to respond. Please note that your name will appear next to your comment (not your email).
Finyear does not offer financial advice of any kind and the opinions of authors are not necessarily those of Finyear.
By posting your comment, you agree to our acceptable use policy. If you read anything here that you consider inappropriate or offensive, please contact the adress : contact (at) finyear.com
Finyear: Daily News & Best Practices for the Finance Executives (CFO, Treasurer, Controller, Credit manager, accountant, financial executive, etc...).

The Financial Year by Finyear. Copyright Finyear 2007-2013. You may share using our article tools.
Please don't cut articles from Finyear.com and redistribute by email or post to the web without permission: contact (at) finyear.com

FRANCAIS
Les articles et les communiqués de presse sont fournis tels quels et n'ont pas été modifiés ou vérifiés.
Toute demande de renseignement doit être adressée à la société émettrice du communiqué de presse ou à l'auteur de l'article.
Si vous avez une question pour l'auteur, ou si vous désirez commenter cet article, utilisez la boîte ci-dessus. Votre commentaire sera modéré avant publication.
Votre commentaire ou question ci-dessous apparaîtra et l'auteur ou l'éditeur Finyear sera en mesure de répondre.
Veuillez noter, s'il vous plaît, que votre nom apparaîtra à côté de votre commentaire (pas votre adresse email).
Finyear n'offre pas de conseils financiers de quelque nature que ce soit et les opinions des auteurs ne sont pas nécessairement celles de Finyear.
En postant votre commentaire, vous acceptez notre politique d'utilisation et nos mentions légales.
Si vous lisez quelque chose ici que vous considérez inapproprié ou offensant, s'il vous plaît contacter l'adresse: contact (at) finyear.com
Finyear: actus quotidiennes et meilleures pratiques pour les cadres financiers (CFO, trésorier, contrôleur, gestionnaire de crédit, comptable, cadre financier, etc ..).

The Financial Year by Finyear. Copyright Finyear 2007-2013. Vous devez utiliser nos outils de partage situés sur les articles.
SVP ne coupez-pas les articles issus de Finyear.com, ne les reroutez-pas par message sur le web sans autorisation : contact (at) finyear.com

Les derniers articles publiés sur Finyear


Lettres Finyear



Conférences


Magazine n°33


FY Research


Livres Blancs



L M M J V S D
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30