Contract complexity: Driving away the competition


I attended a round table event with several peers today to discuss contract language. Specifically, what is the right language to use; how can it be applied to achieve the desired outcome; and how stringent must one be relative to retaining the original contract language.




Shawn Casemore
Shawn Casemore
The consensus from the group, which included procurement practioners from the public and private sector, litigation and arbitration lawyers and a consultant (I wonder who that would be?) was as follows:

1. Complexity of contract language is deepening
As organizations and individuals develop an increasing aversion to risk in a society that is becoming more litigious, contract language is morphing into verbiage that is well beyond comprehendible and achievable. If you want an example, take a look at the five pages of terms and conditions that accompany a cell phone contract.

2. Efficiency in contract management is on the decline
The time required to review, interpret and negotiate the voluminous documents that accompany most contracts is reducing the efficiency of the contract award process. The resulting delays are hindering end users and customers alike. Delays in the completion of the Edinburgh Tramways in Scotland are a great example of this.

3. Increased complexity is reducing trust
In an age where supplier transparency and alignment are key differentiators for leading edge organizations, the increasing complexity of business contractual language and award criteria are driving a wedge between both parties. If you have recently signed mortgage documents, you can imagine the distress and distrust such enormous documents create between both parties.

The consensus from the team was to focus on the following three areas for improving the contract tendering and management process:

1. Clarity: Identify expectations at the outset of the tendering process.

2. Simplicity: Reduce complexity and apply common sense in developing, administering and managing contract language.

3. Transparency: Avoid hiding behind an ulterior motive and focus on being transparent in order to attain the desired value from the relationship.

Applying common sense in conjunction with these three tips will greatly enhance the contract management process. The starting point is a dialogue with Suppliers to identify weaknesses in the process, and to build support in enhancing the process.

Shawn Casemore, President, Casemore and Co.
www.casemoreandco.com

Contract complexity: Driving away the competition

Vendredi 2 Mars 2012
Notez




Nouveau commentaire :
Twitter

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Les derniers articles publiés sur Finyear

Finyear magazine


L M M J V S D
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Finyear évènements


Finyear livres Blancs



Finyear lettres métiers